TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
T2 - a convergence of technologies
AU - Lin, Julie
AU - Ost, David E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Purpose of reviewRobotic bronchoscopy is the newest advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy technology for biopsying peripheral pulmonary lesions; sensitivity for malignancy is currently suboptimal using modalities, such as radial endobronchial ultrasound or electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy. We review the pitfalls of prior methods and the technological advancements with robotic bronchoscopy.Recent findingsThe contributors to reduced diagnostic sensitivity with current approaches include limitations in: navigation to the target, confirmation once the target is reached, and tissue acquisition. CT to body divergence with virtual reality methods, such as with electromagnetic navigation, potential false-positive confirmation with radial endobronchial ultrasound because of intraprocedural induced atelectasis, and lack of bronchoscopic and instrument maneuverability are all limitations to improving sensitivity. Robotic bronchoscopy enhances navigation through target pathway selection, allows for further reach in the distal airways, and improves tissue acquisition with more flexible and maneuverable biopsy instruments but lacks a high-fidelity target confirmation system.SummaryRobotic bronchoscopy shows promise in biopsying peripheral lesions. Current published studies focus on diagnostic yield with robotic bronchoscopy. Future studies with long-term follow-up will be needed to assess diagnostic sensitivity for lung cancer and if robotic bronchoscopy is superior to other advanced diagnostic bronchoscopic techniques for peripheral pulmonary lesions.
AB - Purpose of reviewRobotic bronchoscopy is the newest advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy technology for biopsying peripheral pulmonary lesions; sensitivity for malignancy is currently suboptimal using modalities, such as radial endobronchial ultrasound or electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy. We review the pitfalls of prior methods and the technological advancements with robotic bronchoscopy.Recent findingsThe contributors to reduced diagnostic sensitivity with current approaches include limitations in: navigation to the target, confirmation once the target is reached, and tissue acquisition. CT to body divergence with virtual reality methods, such as with electromagnetic navigation, potential false-positive confirmation with radial endobronchial ultrasound because of intraprocedural induced atelectasis, and lack of bronchoscopic and instrument maneuverability are all limitations to improving sensitivity. Robotic bronchoscopy enhances navigation through target pathway selection, allows for further reach in the distal airways, and improves tissue acquisition with more flexible and maneuverable biopsy instruments but lacks a high-fidelity target confirmation system.SummaryRobotic bronchoscopy shows promise in biopsying peripheral lesions. Current published studies focus on diagnostic yield with robotic bronchoscopy. Future studies with long-term follow-up will be needed to assess diagnostic sensitivity for lung cancer and if robotic bronchoscopy is superior to other advanced diagnostic bronchoscopic techniques for peripheral pulmonary lesions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107391219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107391219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000782
DO - 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000782
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33973554
AN - SCOPUS:85107391219
SN - 1070-5287
VL - 27
SP - 229
EP - 239
JO - Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
JF - Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
IS - 4
ER -