Therapeutic choices after hypomethylating agent resistance for myelodysplastic syndromes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of review Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Although these agents induce responses in up to 40% of patients, most patients ultimately experience loss of response. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the different therapies under development for MDS after HMA therapy. Recent findings Recent advances in the understanding of MDS pathogenesis have led to the development of new potential therapies after HMA failure. Newer HMAs, less susceptible to in-vivo deamination, such as guadecitabine or ASTX727 have shown activity. Alterations of immune checkpoints in MDS have led to multiple clinical trials evaluating the activity of monoclonal antibodies targeting these proteins (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab). Different combinations and new formulations of cytotoxic agents, such as clofarabine or CPX-351, are newer options for specific subsets of patients. Finally, targeted agents inhibiting multiple kinases (rigosertib), BCL2 (venetoclax) or mutant IDH1 (ivosidenib), IDH2 (enasidenib), FLT3 (sorafenib, midostaurin) or spliceosome components (H3B-8800) are other novel options. Summary Despite the poor prognosis associated with HMA failure, clinical trials, new cytotoxic agents and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, can offer therapeutic opportunities for these patients for whom there is no standard of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-153
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent opinion in hematology
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Keywords

  • azacitidine
  • decitabine
  • hypomethylating agents failure
  • myelodysplastic syndromes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic choices after hypomethylating agent resistance for myelodysplastic syndromes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this