Abstract
Evidence-based practice is foundational to high-quality palliative care delivery. However, the clinical trials that compose the evidence base are often methodologically imperfect. Applying their conclusions without critical application to the clinical practice context can harm patients. The tips provided can help clinicians infer judiciously from clinical trial results and avoid credulously accepting findings without critique. We suggest that statistical and mathematical expertise is unnecessary, but rather a keen curiosity about investigators’ rationale for certain design choices and how these choices can affect results is key. For a more comprehensive understanding of clinical trials, this article can be used with the authors’ corresponding ten tips article that focuses on designing a clinical trial.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 517-523 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of palliative medicine |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2025 |
Keywords
- clinical trials
- data interpretation
- evidence-based palliative care
- quality of data
- randomized control trials
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Nursing
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Interpreting a Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS