Using computed tomography scans and patient demographic data to estimate thoracic epidural space depth

Alyssa Kosturakis, Jose Soliz, Jackson Su, Juan P. Cata, Lei Feng, Nusrat Harun, Ashley Amsbaugh, Rodolfo Gebhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous studies have used varying methods to estimate the depth of the epidural space prior to placement of an epidural catheter. We aim to use computed tomography scans, patient demographics, and vertebral level to estimate the depth of the loss of resistance for placement of thoracic epidural catheters. Methods. The records of consecutive patients who received a thoracic epidural catheter were reviewed. Patient demographics, epidural placement site, and technique were collected. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to measure the skin to epidural space distance. Linear regression was used for a multivariate analysis. Results. The records of 218 patients were reviewed. The mean loss of resistance measurement was significantly larger than the mean computed tomography epidural space depth measurement by 0.79 cm (p<0.001). Our final multivariate model, adjusted for demographic and epidural technique, showed a positive correlation between the loss of resistance and the computed tomography epidural space depth measurement (R2=0.5692, p<0.0001). Conclusions. The measured loss of resistance is positively correlated with the computed tomography epidural space depth measurement and patient demographics. For patients undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgery, estimating the loss of resistance can be a valuable tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number470240
JournalPain Research and Treatment
Volume2015
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using computed tomography scans and patient demographic data to estimate thoracic epidural space depth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this