Veliparib in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-Naïve extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized study

Lauren Averett Byers, Dmitry Bentsion, Steven Gans, Konstantin Penkov, Choon Hee Son, Anne Sibille, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Harry J.M. Groen, Carl M. Gay, Junya Fujimoto, Patricia de Groot, Martin Dunbar, Kingston Kang, Lei He, Vasudha Sehgal, Jaimee Glasgow, Bruce Allen Bach, Peter M. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral PARP inhibitor veliparib, plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-naïve, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to veliparib [240 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days] plus chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance (400 mg BID; veliparib throughout), veliparib plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (veliparib combination only), or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (control). Patients received 4–6 cycles of combination therapy, then maintenance until unacceptable toxicity/progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with veliparib throughout versus control. Results: Overall (N ¼ 181), PFS was improved with veliparib throughout versus control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 80% confidence interval (CI), 0.50–0.88; P ¼ 0.059]; median PFS was 5.8 and 5.6 months, respectively. There was a trend toward improved PFS with veliparib throughout versus control in SLFN11-positive patients (HR, 0.6; 80% CI, 0.36–0.97). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.1 versus 12.4 months in the veliparib throughout and control arms, respectively (HR, 1.43; 80% CI, 1.09–1.88). Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced by 82%, 88%, and 68% of patients in the veliparib throughout, veliparib combination-only and control arms, most commonly hematologic. Conclusions: Veliparib plus platinum chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance demonstrated improved PFS as first-line treatment for ED-SCLC with an acceptable safety profile, but there was no corresponding benefit in OS. Further investigation is warranted to define the role of biomarkers in this setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3884-3895
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume27
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Veliparib in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-Naïve extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this