TY - JOUR
T1 - A blast from the past and foresight for the future of gynecologic oncology
AU - Yashar, Catheryn
AU - Beriwal, Sushil
AU - Mell, Loren
AU - Klopp, Ann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - This is the long-term follow-up of the Norwegian Radium Hospital randomized trial for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Between 1968 and 1974, 568 women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer received 60 Gy of vaginal brachytherapy after hysterectomy. The women were then randomized to 40 Gy pelvic radiation therapy with a central block after 20 Gy or to no further therapy. The initial analysis, published in 1980 by Aalders et al (9), reported a reduction in pelvic recurrences in patients receiving pelvic radiation but no difference in overall survival. A subset analysis of this study was among the first to report that patients with high-risk features, such as deep invasion and high grade, were most likely to benefit from adjuvant pelvic irradiation. In this updated report, after a median follow-up time of 20 years, there was still no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms except in women younger than 60. In this population, overall survival was lower in those receiving pelvic radiation. The decrement in survival was attributed in part to a 2-fold higher rate of secondary malignancies in the younger women who received pelvic radiation therapy.
AB - This is the long-term follow-up of the Norwegian Radium Hospital randomized trial for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Between 1968 and 1974, 568 women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer received 60 Gy of vaginal brachytherapy after hysterectomy. The women were then randomized to 40 Gy pelvic radiation therapy with a central block after 20 Gy or to no further therapy. The initial analysis, published in 1980 by Aalders et al (9), reported a reduction in pelvic recurrences in patients receiving pelvic radiation but no difference in overall survival. A subset analysis of this study was among the first to report that patients with high-risk features, such as deep invasion and high grade, were most likely to benefit from adjuvant pelvic irradiation. In this updated report, after a median follow-up time of 20 years, there was still no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms except in women younger than 60. In this population, overall survival was lower in those receiving pelvic radiation. The decrement in survival was attributed in part to a 2-fold higher rate of secondary malignancies in the younger women who received pelvic radiation therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925307806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925307806&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 25832680
AN - SCOPUS:84925307806
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 91
SP - 885
EP - 887
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 5
ER -