A comparative randomized trial of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in combination with fluorouracil (FAC) or etoposide (EAC) in metastatic breast cancer

A. U. Buzdar, H. Y. Yap, L. Esparza, F. Holmes, G. Fraschini, V. Hug, G. Hortobagyi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this prospective study, two doxorubicin-containing regimens were evaluated as induction therapy, one containing etoposide (EAC) and the other fluorouracil (FAC). Following induction therapy, patients were given an alternate drug regimen consisting of vinblastine, methotrexate and either fluorouracil (VMF) or etoposide (VME), to evaluate its impact on response rate and duration of response and survival. All patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors or unknown receptor status were also treated with tamoxifen for six to eight weeks prior to initiation of chemotherapy. Of 157 evaluable patients in the study, response to induction chemotherapy was 63% in the FAC group and 68% in the EAC arm. With alternate therapy there was improvement in response in 44% of the EAC group and in 29% of the FAC group. The durations of remissions and survival were similar between the two treatment arms. A small number of patients received regional consolidation therapy at maximum response; these patients had longer time for progression and survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-55
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy
Volume1
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative randomized trial of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in combination with fluorouracil (FAC) or etoposide (EAC) in metastatic breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this