A Comparison of Outcomes and Prognostic Features for Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast and Other Radiation-Associated Sarcomas

Jeffrey K. Mito, Devarati Mitra, Constance M. Barysauskas, Adrián Mariño-Enriquez, Elizabeth A. Morgan, Christopher D.M. Fletcher, Chandrajit P. Raut, Elizabeth H. Baldini, Leona A. Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation-associated sarcomas (RAS)are considered to have a poor prognosis. Although the incidence is anticipated to rise, contemporary data regarding predictors of outcomes are few. We performed a retrospective analysis to identify RAS prognostic factors and subset analyses for radiation-associated angiosarcoma arising after treatment for breast cancer (RAAB)and other RAS subtypes (other-RAS). Methods and Materials: Patients with localized RAS evaluated at an institutional multidisciplinary sarcoma clinic were identified. Clinical and histologic review was performed, and outcomes were assessed to identify prognostic features. A subset of cases underwent molecular analysis by next-generation sequencing. Results: Among 176 patients, histologic subtypes of RAS included angiosarcoma (41%), undifferentiated/unclassified sarcoma (40%), leiomyosarcoma (8%), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (6%), and osteosarcoma (2%). Sixty-seven patients (38%)had RAAB, and 109 (62%)had other-RAS. RAAB had significantly shorter latency from time of initial radiation compared with other-RAS (8 vs. 15 years; P <.001). Treatment approaches included surgery (91%), chemotherapy (44%), and radiation therapy (27%). Median follow-up was 3.2 years; 3-year overall survival (OS)was 74%. On multivariate analysis, positive margins (P <.0001), deep tumor location (intrathoracic/intra-abdominal, P =.002), and high grade (P <.0001)were associated with worse OS. In particular, 3-year OS with negative versus positive margins was 90% versus 66%. Patients with RAAB versus other-RAS showed a trend for higher 3-year OS (84% vs 68%; P =.09), significantly higher 3-year metastasis-free survival (82% vs 67%; P =.001), but similar 3-year local recurrence-free survival (54% vs 61%; P =.28). Next-generation sequencing identified overall low tumor mutational burden, recurrent MYC amplification in RAAB, and few clinically actionable mutations. Conclusions: Margin negative excision, superficial tumor location, and low tumor grade are determinants of improved OS for RAS, suggesting that complete surgical excision, when possible, is an optimal component of treatment. RAAB is a clinicopathologically distinct type of RAS with shorter latency from initial RT, different recurrence patterns, and when aggressively managed has potentially better outcomes compared with other-RAS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-435
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Outcomes and Prognostic Features for Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast and Other Radiation-Associated Sarcomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this