TY - JOUR
T1 - A framework for voxel-based assessment of biological effect after proton radiotherapy in pediatric brain cancer patients using multi-modal imaging
AU - Skaarup, Mikkel
AU - Lundemann, Michael Juncker
AU - Darkner, Sune
AU - Jørgensen, Morten
AU - Marner, Lisbeth
AU - Mirkovic, Dragan
AU - Grosshans, David
AU - Peeler, Christopher
AU - Mohan, Radhe
AU - Vogelius, Ivan Richter
AU - Appelt, Ane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Introduction: The exact dependence of biological effect on dose and linear energy transfer (LET) in human tissue when delivering proton therapy is unknown. In this study, we propose a framework for measuring this dependency using multi-modal image-based assays with deformable registrations within imaging sessions and across time. Materials and Methods: 3T MRI scans were prospectively collected from 6 pediatric brain cancer patients before they underwent proton therapy treatment, and every 3 months for a year after treatment. Scans included T1-weighted with contrast enhancement (T1), T2-FLAIR (T2) and fractional anisotropy (FA) images. In addition, the planning CT, dose distributions and Monte Carlo-calculated LET distributions were collected. A multi-modal deformable image registration framework was used to create a dataset of dose, LET and imaging intensities at baseline and follow-up on a voxel-by-voxel basis. We modelled the biological effect of dose and LET from proton therapy using imaging changes over time as a surrogate for biological effect. We investigated various models to show the feasibility of the framework to model imaging changes. To account for interpatient and intrapatient variations, we used a nested generalized linear mixed regression model. The models were applied to predict imaging changes over time as a function of dose and LET for each modality. Results: Using the nested models to predict imaging changes, we saw a decrease in the FA signal as a function of dose; however, the signal increased with increasing LET. Similarly, we saw an increase in T2 signal as a function of dose, but a decrease in signal with LET. We saw no changes in T1 voxel values as a function of either dose or LET. Conclusions: The imaging changes could successfully model biological effect as a function of dose and LET using our proposed framework. Due to the low number of patients, the imaging changes observed for FA and T2 scans were not marked enough to draw any firm conclusions.
AB - Introduction: The exact dependence of biological effect on dose and linear energy transfer (LET) in human tissue when delivering proton therapy is unknown. In this study, we propose a framework for measuring this dependency using multi-modal image-based assays with deformable registrations within imaging sessions and across time. Materials and Methods: 3T MRI scans were prospectively collected from 6 pediatric brain cancer patients before they underwent proton therapy treatment, and every 3 months for a year after treatment. Scans included T1-weighted with contrast enhancement (T1), T2-FLAIR (T2) and fractional anisotropy (FA) images. In addition, the planning CT, dose distributions and Monte Carlo-calculated LET distributions were collected. A multi-modal deformable image registration framework was used to create a dataset of dose, LET and imaging intensities at baseline and follow-up on a voxel-by-voxel basis. We modelled the biological effect of dose and LET from proton therapy using imaging changes over time as a surrogate for biological effect. We investigated various models to show the feasibility of the framework to model imaging changes. To account for interpatient and intrapatient variations, we used a nested generalized linear mixed regression model. The models were applied to predict imaging changes over time as a function of dose and LET for each modality. Results: Using the nested models to predict imaging changes, we saw a decrease in the FA signal as a function of dose; however, the signal increased with increasing LET. Similarly, we saw an increase in T2 signal as a function of dose, but a decrease in signal with LET. We saw no changes in T1 voxel values as a function of either dose or LET. Conclusions: The imaging changes could successfully model biological effect as a function of dose and LET using our proposed framework. Due to the low number of patients, the imaging changes observed for FA and T2 scans were not marked enough to draw any firm conclusions.
KW - MRI response assessment
KW - diffusion MRI
KW - multi-modality registration
KW - proton therapy
KW - radiobiology of protons
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107402050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107402050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mp.14989
DO - 10.1002/mp.14989
M3 - Article
C2 - 34021597
AN - SCOPUS:85107402050
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 48
SP - 4110
EP - 4121
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
IS - 7
ER -