A phase II study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-resistant early-stage triple-negative breast cancer

Clinton Yam, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Haven R. Garber, Ryan Sun, Senthil Damodaran, Rashmi K. Murthy, David Ramirez, Meghan Karuturi, Rachel M. Layman, Nuhad Ibrahim, Gaiane M. Rauch, Beatriz E. Adrada, Rosalind P. Candelaria, Jason B. White, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Alyson Clayborn, Qing Qing Ding, W. Fraser Symmans, Sabitha Prabhakaran, Alastair M. ThompsonVicente Valero, Debu Tripathy, Lei Huo, Stacy L. Moulder, Jennifer K. Litton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in unselected triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Given the potential for long-term morbidity from immune-related adverse events (irAEs), optimizing the risk–benefit ratio for these agents in the curative neoadjuvant setting is important. Suboptimal clinical response to initial neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is associated with low rates of pCR (2–5%) and may define a patient selection strategy for neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade. We conducted a single-arm phase II study of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel as the second phase of NAT in patients with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC)-resistant TNBC (NCT02530489). Methods: Patients with stage I–III, AC-resistant TNBC, defined as disease progression or a < 80% reduction in tumor volume after 4 cycles of AC, were eligible. Patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg IV, Q3weeks × 4) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 IV,Q1 week × 12) as the second phase of NAT before undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant atezolizumab (1200 mg IV, Q3 weeks, × 4). A two-stage Gehan-type design was employed to detect an improvement in pCR/residual cancer burden class I (RCB-I) rate from 5 to 20%. Results: From 2/15/2016 through 1/29/2021, 37 patients with AC-resistant TNBC were enrolled. The pCR/RCB-I rate was 46%. No new safety signals were observed. Seven patients (19%) discontinued atezolizumab due to irAEs. Conclusion: This study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a promising signal of activity in this high-risk population (pCR/RCB-I = 46% vs 5% in historical controls), suggesting that a response-adapted approach to the utilization of neoadjuvant immunotherapy should be considered for further evaluation in a randomized clinical trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-469
Number of pages13
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume199
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Atezolizumab
  • Chemotherapy resistance
  • Phase II trial
  • Triple-negative breast cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase II study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-resistant early-stage triple-negative breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this