A two‐dimensional electrophoresis‐related laboratory information processing system: Spot matching

Rork D. Kuick, Michael M. Skolnick, Samir M. Hanash, James V. Neel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

An approach for the computer‐assisted analysis of two‐dimensional gels has been developed as a part of our laboratory information processing system (LIPS). This approach relies in part on an algorithm for the pairwise matching of protein spots. The matching process initially matches spots based on a cross‐correlational measure of how well neighboring spots align. While this first pass correctly determines most spot correspondences and noncorrespondences, it can make errors. Higher accuracy is obtained by monitoring the consistency of spot match decisions in a second pass, which demands that neighboring spot pairs that align spatially must also have been found to match in the first pass. Pairwise comparisons of gels are, combined into n‐way comparisons by matching spot lists of gels to “master” gel spot lists, which in turn are matched to higher level masters, resulting in a hierarchy of matched spots. After each pairwise match the results are reviewed and corrected with the assistance of a graphical match‐editor. Results are given for 19, single‐Cell‐derived lymphoid clones in which the presence of a mutation had previously been established, each processed in duplicate. Only one of 46 spot changes failed to be detected, which demonstrates that the strategy is sensitive and efficient for detecting qualitative spot differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-746
Number of pages11
JournalELECTROPHORESIS
Volume12
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A two‐dimensional electrophoresis‐related laboratory information processing system: Spot matching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this