AI and access to justice: How AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based barriers to justice

Brandon Long, Amitabha Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

ChatGPT – a large language model – recently passed the U.S. bar exam. The startling rise and power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT lead us to consider whether and how more specialized systems could be used to overcome existing barriers to the legal system. Such systems could be employed in either of the two major stages of the pursuit of justice: preliminary information gathering and formal engagement with the state’s legal institutions and professionals. We focus on the former and argue that developing and deploying publicly funded AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based cultural barriers to the information-gathering stage of pursuing justice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-27
Number of pages7
JournalZeitschrift fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2024

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • barriers to justice
  • law
  • philosophy of technology
  • shame

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI and access to justice: How AI legal advisors can reduce economic and shame-based barriers to justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this