Ampicillin-Sulbactam vs Clindamycin in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: The Need for Gram-negative Coverage

Randal S. Weber, Issam Raad, Robert Frankenthaler, Patti Hankins, Robert M. Byers, Oscar Guillamondegui, Pat Wolf, Terry Smith, Helmuth Goepfert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess whether gram-negative antimicrobial coverage is required in patients undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery. Ampicillin sodium–sulbactam sodium and clindamycin phosphate were compared in a prospective, randomized, parallel, double-blind trial of 212 patients undergoing head and neck procedures involving clean-contaminated wounds. Both antibiotics were given up to 1 hour before surgery and continued at 6-hour intervals after surgery for an additional eight doses. Fourteen infections occurred in the ampicillin-sulbactam–treated group (13.3%) and 29 infections in the clindamycin-treated group (27.1%). From patients receiving clindamycin, 29 gram-negative organisms were isolated, compared with six from those patients receiving ampicillin-sulbactam. This finding supports the need for gram-negative coverage in patients undergoing clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery. (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:1159-1163)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1159-1163
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery
Volume118
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ampicillin-Sulbactam vs Clindamycin in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: The Need for Gram-negative Coverage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this