Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with joint prostheses?

Jed J. Jacobson, Stuart Schweitzer, David J. DePorter, J. Jack Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

A decision analysis was performed to assess the risks, costs, and effects of no prophylaxis, oral penicillin, and cephalexin regimens currently being debated for dental patients at risk for late prosthetic joint infection (LPJI). The analysis suggests that there is a very small risk of LPJI (29,3 cases per 106 dental visits), which is outweighed by a greater risk of death with an oral penicillin strategy than with a “no prophylaxis” strategy (2.31:1.93). An oral cephalosporin appears to spare life and limb but does so at an extremely high cost. Over 500,000 must be spent to spare one year of life, while 480,000 needs to be spent to prevent one case of LPJI. Some individual dental patients may still be at a much greater risk for LPJI than others. However, from the evidence to date, routine predental antibiotic prophylaxis for all prosthetic joint patients is a very expensive preventive strategy and is not cost-effective. However, clinical experience suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis may be appropriate in some situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-587
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1990
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with joint prostheses?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this