Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy, Interest, and Outcome Expectations for Career Development in Academic Medicine

Cheryl B. Anderson, Hwa Young Lee, Angela Byars-Winston, Constance D. Baldwin, Carrie Cameron, Shine Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Competency in forms of scientific communication, both written and spoken, is essential for success in academic science. This study examined the psychometric properties of three new measures, based on social cognitive career theory, that are relevant to assessment of skill and perseverance in scientific communication. Pre- and postdoctoral trainees in biomedical science (N = 411) completed online questionnaires assessing self-efficacy in scientific communication, career outcome expectations, and interest in performing tasks in scientific writing, oral presentation, and impromptu scientific discourse. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate factor structures and model relations. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a 22-item, 3-factor measure of self-efficacy; an 11-item, 2-factor measure of outcome expectations; and a 12-item, 3-factor measure of interest in scientific communication activities. Construct validity was further demonstrated by theory-consistent inter-factor relations and relations with typical communications performance behaviors (e.g., writing manuscripts, abstracts, and presenting at national meetings).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-196
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Career Assessment
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • LISREL
  • SCCT
  • academic medicine
  • career development
  • measurement
  • scale development
  • scientific communication
  • social cognitive theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy, Interest, and Outcome Expectations for Career Development in Academic Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this