BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations: Methodology and clinical evaluation

Mary Alikian, Gareth Gerrard, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Katherine Mudge, Pierre Foskett, Jamshid Sorouri Khorashad, Ai Chiin Lim, David Marin, Dragana Milojkovic, Alistair Reid, Katy Rezvani, John Goldman, Jane Apperley, Letizia Foroni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), starting with imatinib and followed by second and third generation TKIs, has significantly changed the clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Despite their unprecedented clinical success, a proportion of patients fail to achieve complete cytogenetic remission by 12 months of treatment (primary resistance) while others experience progressive resistance after an initial response (secondary resistance). BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutations have been detected in a proportion of patients at the time of treatment failure, and therefore their identification and monitoring plays an important role in therapeutic decisions particularly when switching TKIs. When monitoring KD mutations in a clinical laboratory, the choice of method should take into account turnaround time, cost, sensitivity, specificity, and ability to accurately quantify the size of the mutant clone. In this article, we describe in a "manual" style the methods most widely used in our laboratory to monitor KD mutations in patients with CML including direct sequencing, D-HPLC, and pyrosequencing. Advantages, disadvantages, interpretation of results, and their clinical applications are reviewed for each method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-304
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of hematology
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations: Methodology and clinical evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this