Bridging therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium

Michael D. Jain, Miriam T. Jacobs, Feng Gao, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Jay Y. Spiegel, Yi Lin, Saurabh Dahiya, Matthew Lunning, Lazaros Lekakis, Patrick Reagan, Olalekan Oluwole, Joseph McGuirk, Abhinav Deol, Alison R. Sehgal, Andre Goy, Brian T. Hill, Charalambos Andreadis, Javier Munoz, Julio C. Chavez, N. Nora BennaniAaron P. Rapoport, Julie M. Vose, David Miklos, Sattva S. Neelapu, Frederick L. Locke, Armin Ghobadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

During the manufacturing period of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, patients may experience a decline in their condition due to cancer progression. In this study, we investigated the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received antilymphoma treatment between leukapheresis and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion. We conducted our analysis using data from the multicenter US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, with a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4.3-42.1). Out of the 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 patients received axi-cel. A total 52% of patients (n = 143) who received BT had a higher baseline risk profile than patients who did not receive BT, and these patients, as a group, had inferior outcomes compared with those who did not receive BT. However, after propensity score matching between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in overall response rate (77% vs 87%; P = .13), complete response rate (58% vs 70%; P = .1), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; P = .23), and overall survival (HR, 1.39; P=.09) between the BT group and the no-BT group, respectively. Analyzing the effects of BT in the whole cohort that underwent leukapheresis regardless of receiving axi-cel (intention-to-treat analysis) showed similar results. Radiation BT resulted in outcomes similar to those observed with nonradiation BT. Our findings suggest that BT may be safe without a significant impact on long-term survival for patients who require disease stabilization during the manufacturing period. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no clear advantage to using radiation-based BT over nonradiation-based BT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1042-1050
Number of pages9
JournalBlood Advances
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 27 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this