CD138 (Syndecan-1) in thymic tumors: Correlation with various World Health Organization types and clinical outcome

M. Al-Agha Osama, Liu Weiguo, Chandrasekhar Rameela, Wilding Gregory, Tan Dongfeng, Alrawi Sadir, Khoury Thaer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We intended to explore the relationship of CD138 with thymic tumors. A series of 64 thymic tumors were studied. Positive staining was seen in 7 of 8 (87.5%) type A, 7 of 16 (43.7%) type AB, 1 of 8 (12.5%) type B1, 1 of 5 (20%) type B2, 10 of 17 (58.8%) type B3, and 3 of 10 (30%) type C (p=0.04), respectively. In terms of subcellular location of CD138 expression, 9 of 10 (90%) CD138 positive type B3 had membranous expression, while cytoplasmic expression was identified in 7 of 7 (100%) type A, and 6 of 7 (86%) type AB (p<0.0001). Positive CD138 was noted in 20 of 31 (64.5%) cases with Masaoka stage I (p= 0.01); while negative CD138 was seen in 24 of 33 (72.7%) cases with Masaoka stages (II-IV). Tumor recurred in 4 cases (7%), all of which had negative CD138 (p=0.008). Our study suggests that CD138 could be used as an ancillary study to differentiate between WHO types. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that advanced stage-thymic tumors as well as those with high recurrence rate tend to display a reduced expression of CD138. However, more studies with larger cohort and longer follow-up are warranted to validate the clinical utility of CD138 to assess clinical behavior and prognosis of thymic tumors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-287
Number of pages8
JournalInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology
Volume3
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • CD138
  • Correlation
  • Prognosis
  • Syndecan-1
  • Thymic tumors
  • WHO classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CD138 (Syndecan-1) in thymic tumors: Correlation with various World Health Organization types and clinical outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this