Chicken Fetal and Adult Antigen Expression on Erythroleukemia Cells before and after Induced Differentiation

Bob G. Sanders, James P. Allison, Kimberly Kline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Avian erythroblastosis virus strain R (AEVMransformed, cloned erythroleukemia cells from three different ages of SC strain chickens were analyzed before and after differentiation induced by 1.0 mM butyric acid for expression of chicken fetal antigens (CFAs) and chicken adult antigens (CAAs) and for hemoglobin expression. lmmunofluorescent analyses show the loss of individual CFA determinants from erythroleukemia cells with induced differentiation, although there appeared to be no correlation between CFA loss and onset of hemoglobin production. Erythroleukemia cells were examined by cell surface labeling followed by immunoprecipitation with antisera specific to CFAs and CAAs. Erythroleukemia cells expressed CFAs and CAAs on their membranes that are not reported to be expressed by the target cell of AEV. The expression of CAAs and the enhanced expression of CFAs by erythroleukemia cells may be due to limited cellular differentiation, alterations in regulatory controls of genes coding for CFAs and CAAs, or increased levels of production of previously undetected CFAs and CAAs following AEV transformation. Control and induced erythroleukemia cells expressed CFAs and CAAs that differed both quantitatively and qualitatively from normal erythroid cells. Molecular weight variations of CFAs and CAAs observed in the erythroleukemia cells may represent glycolyzation differences between AEV-transformed cells and normal erythroid cells.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4625-4630
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Research
Volume42
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 1982
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chicken Fetal and Adult Antigen Expression on Erythroleukemia Cells before and after Induced Differentiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this