Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable method for detecting her2 gene status in breast cancer a multicenter study using conventional scoring criteria and the new asco/cap recommendations

Yun Gong, William Sweet, Yi Jing Duh, Larry Greenfield, Yuan Fang, Jianxin Zhao, Emily Tarco, W. Fraser Symmans, Jorma Isola, Nour Sneige

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has shown the potential to replace fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to determine HER2 gene status. To validate the reliability of CISH, we used 226 consecutive breast carcinomas from 2 institutions and tested CISH and FISH on the same tumor set simultaneously at different test sites. Besides manufacturers' scoring criteria, the new American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines were used to interpretHER2 status. The concordance between CISH and FISHfor positive and negative results was 98.5% at site A and 98.6% at site B using the manufacturers' criteria, and 99.0% at site A and 99.1% at site B using the ASCO/CAP criteria. Reproducibility of CISH results was more than 98.0% among 3 sites using the manufacturers' criteria and 100.0% between 2 sites using the ASCO/CAP criteria. Our results confirm that CISH is reliable for HER2 testing per ASCO/CAP guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-497
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Keywords

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • CISH
  • Chromogenic in situ hybridization
  • College of American Pathologists
  • Concordance
  • FISH
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • HER2
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable method for detecting her2 gene status in breast cancer a multicenter study using conventional scoring criteria and the new asco/cap recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this