Clinical assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To review the evidence on interventions for managing cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and provide evidence-based guidance on approaches to its management. Methods: Nonsystematic review of the literature. Results: Several theories have been proposed to explain the biology of CRF, but there is no single clear mechanism that can be targeted for therapy. The approach to patients begins with screening for fatigue and assessing its intensity, followed by a thorough history and examination to determine whether any reversible medical conditions are contributing to fatigue. Management of underlying medical comorbidities may help some patients. For patients whose fatigue persists, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options are available. Pharmacologic options include psychostimulants, such as methylphenidate and modafinil, and corticosteroids. Nonpharmacologic approaches include exercise, cognitive behavior therapy, yoga, acupuncture, and tai chi. Conclusion: We recommend an individualized approach, often with a combination of the available options. Patients need to be evaluated periodically to assess their fatigue, and since cancer-related fatigue affects survivors, long-Term follow-up is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-228
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Volume24
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2017

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Fatigue
  • Nonpharmacologic
  • Pro-inflammatory cytokines
  • Psychostimulants.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this