CLINICAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC SONOGRAPHY USING LINEAR VERSUS RADIAL PROBES.

B. D. Fornage; M. D. Rifkin; J. L. Deshayes; D. H. Touche

CLINICAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC SONOGRAPHY USING LINEAR VERSUS RADIAL PROBES.

B. D. Fornage, M. D. Rifkin, J. L. Deshayes, D. H. Touche

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

98 patients were scanned consecutively with one radial and one linear probes during the same examination. Advantages and drawbacks of the two types of transrectal probes are basically related to the different physical principles of real-time scanning (sector versus linear) and the different plans of cross-section available. Anatomic relationships of prostate are more easily analysed with radial scanning since the examiner is more familiar with transverse cross-sections. The linear probe better displays lithiases and allows a urodynamic non invasive study of the vesical neck and posterior urethra during the micturition.

Original language	English (US)
Pages	15
Number of pages	1
State	Published - 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Engineering

Cite this

@conference{8f0a8b44a78e4514aceb49a43d6932da,

title = "CLINICAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC SONOGRAPHY USING LINEAR VERSUS RADIAL PROBES.",

abstract = "98 patients were scanned consecutively with one radial and one linear probes during the same examination. Advantages and drawbacks of the two types of transrectal probes are basically related to the different physical principles of real-time scanning (sector versus linear) and the different plans of cross-section available. Anatomic relationships of prostate are more easily analysed with radial scanning since the examiner is more familiar with transverse cross-sections. The linear probe better displays lithiases and allows a urodynamic non invasive study of the vesical neck and posterior urethra during the micturition.",

author = "Fornage, {B. D.} and Rifkin, {M. D.} and Deshayes, {J. L.} and Touche, {D. H.}",

year = "1984",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "15",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - CLINICAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC SONOGRAPHY USING LINEAR VERSUS RADIAL PROBES.

AU - Fornage, B. D.

AU - Rifkin, M. D.

AU - Deshayes, J. L.

AU - Touche, D. H.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - 98 patients were scanned consecutively with one radial and one linear probes during the same examination. Advantages and drawbacks of the two types of transrectal probes are basically related to the different physical principles of real-time scanning (sector versus linear) and the different plans of cross-section available. Anatomic relationships of prostate are more easily analysed with radial scanning since the examiner is more familiar with transverse cross-sections. The linear probe better displays lithiases and allows a urodynamic non invasive study of the vesical neck and posterior urethra during the micturition.

AB - 98 patients were scanned consecutively with one radial and one linear probes during the same examination. Advantages and drawbacks of the two types of transrectal probes are basically related to the different physical principles of real-time scanning (sector versus linear) and the different plans of cross-section available. Anatomic relationships of prostate are more easily analysed with radial scanning since the examiner is more familiar with transverse cross-sections. The linear probe better displays lithiases and allows a urodynamic non invasive study of the vesical neck and posterior urethra during the micturition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021618805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021618805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:0021618805

SP - 15

ER -

CLINICAL COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TRANSRECTAL PROSTATIC SONOGRAPHY USING LINEAR VERSUS RADIAL PROBES.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this