TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinically challenging mammographic artifacts
T2 - A pictorial guide
AU - Coscia, John
AU - Jaskulski, Susan
AU - Wang, Jihong
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Artifacts on mammographic images detract from the overall quality of the images and often present clinical and technical troubleshooting difficulties for the interpreting radiologist, technologist, and medical physicist and for the equipment and processor service personnel. This presentation demonstrates several types of mammographic artifacts that may pose a clinical challenge. They are arranged in the following categories: (1) particularly dangerous artifacts, (2) masses, (3) calcifications, (4) density variations, and (5) miscellaneous artifacts. Examples of such findings as summation shadows, normal anatomic variations, and incorrect positioning are also demonstrated as artifacts in this guide, because they may affect image quality or patient radiation dose. Under the Mammography Quality Standards Act, the lead interpreting physician has the responsibility for ensuring that the facility meets quality assurance requirements and is required to follow up with the technologist on poor-quality images. It is vital to recognize and correct for artifacts, whether they simulate non-existent lesions or obscure real pathology, because misinterpretation can lead to undesirable consequences.
AB - Artifacts on mammographic images detract from the overall quality of the images and often present clinical and technical troubleshooting difficulties for the interpreting radiologist, technologist, and medical physicist and for the equipment and processor service personnel. This presentation demonstrates several types of mammographic artifacts that may pose a clinical challenge. They are arranged in the following categories: (1) particularly dangerous artifacts, (2) masses, (3) calcifications, (4) density variations, and (5) miscellaneous artifacts. Examples of such findings as summation shadows, normal anatomic variations, and incorrect positioning are also demonstrated as artifacts in this guide, because they may affect image quality or patient radiation dose. Under the Mammography Quality Standards Act, the lead interpreting physician has the responsibility for ensuring that the facility meets quality assurance requirements and is required to follow up with the technologist on poor-quality images. It is vital to recognize and correct for artifacts, whether they simulate non-existent lesions or obscure real pathology, because misinterpretation can lead to undesirable consequences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035220502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035220502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/mdr.2001.112723
DO - 10.1067/mdr.2001.112723
M3 - Article
C2 - 11211883
AN - SCOPUS:0035220502
SN - 0363-0188
VL - 30
SP - 6
EP - 18
JO - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
JF - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
IS - 1
ER -