Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy

Deborah A. Kuban, Larry B. Levy, Louis Potters, David C. Beyer, John C. Blasko, Brian J. Moran, Jay P. Ciezki, Anthony L. Zietman, Michael J. Zelefsky, Thomas M. Pisansky, Mohamed Elshaikh, Eric M. Horwitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions for patients with Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by permanent prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: A total of 2,693 patients treated with radioisotopic implant as solitary treatment for T1-T2 prostatic adenocarcinoma were studied. All patients had a pretreatment PSA, were treated at least 5 years before analysis, 1988 to 1998, and did not receive hormonal therapy before recurrence. Multiple PSA failure definitions were tested for their ability to predict clinical failure. Results: Definitions which determined failure by a certain increment of PSA rise above the lowest PSA level to date (nadir + x ng/mL) were more sensitive and specific than failure definitions based on PSA doubling time or a certain number of PSA rises. The sensitivity and specificity for the nadir + 2 definition were 72% and 83%, vs. 51% and 81% for 3 PSA rises. The surgical type definitions (PSA exceeding an absolute value) could match this sensitivity and specificity but only when failure was defined as exceeding a PSA level in the 1-3 ng/mL range and only when patients were allowed adequate time to nadir. When failure definitions were compared by time varying covariate regression analysis, nadir + 2 ng/mL retained the best fit. Conclusions: For patients treated by permanent radioisotopic implant for prostate cancer, the definition nadir + 2 ng/mL provides the best surrogate for failure throughout the entire follow-up period, similar to patients treated by external beam radiotherapy. Therefore, the same PSA failure definition could be used for both modalities. For brachytherapy patients with long-term follow-up, at least 6 years, defining failure as exceeding an absolute PSA level in the 0.5 ng/mL range may be reasonable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1487-1493
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume65
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Keywords

  • Brachytherapy
  • Failure
  • Implant
  • PSA
  • Prostate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of biochemical failure definitions for permanent prostate brachytherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this