TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Treatment Tolerance and Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in a Prospective Randomized Trial or With Standard Treatment
AU - Torres, Mylin A.
AU - Jhingran, Anuja
AU - Thames, Howard D.
AU - Levenback, Charles F.
AU - Bodurka, Diane C.
AU - Ramondetta, Lois M.
AU - Eifel, Patricia J.
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - Purpose: To compare the treatment and outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in a multi-institutional trial or as standard care. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the records of 302 patients treated with CT-RT for locoregionally confined, intact cervical cancer between 1990 and 2005. Of the 302 patients, 76 were treated using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (C/F) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01 (CT-RT90-01); 226 underwent CT-RT as standard care with either C/F [CT-RTSC(C/F); n = 115] or weekly cisplatin [CT-RTSC(WC); n = 111). Results: The CT-RT90-01 patients more often had tumors ≥6 cm and were less often diabetic than were the CT-RTSC patients. The CT-RTSC(WC) patients were more likely than the CT-RTSC(C/F) patients to be ≥60 years old or to have Stage III-IV disease. During treatment, CT-RTSC(C/F) patients experienced more Grade 2-3 neutropenia and were, therefore, less likely to receive 200 mg/m2 cisplatin than were either CT-RTSC(WC) or CT-RT90-01 patients (52% vs. 77% vs. 85%, respectively; p <0.001). At 5 years, the disease-specific survival rates were greater for patients treated with C/F [CT-RTSC(C/F), 75%; CT-RT90-01, 79%] than for those treated with CT-RTSC(WC) (58%; p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, C/F chemotherapy, cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2, Stage I-II disease, and negative pelvic lymph nodes were independent predictors of improved disease-specific survival. Conclusions: Even within a large comprehensive cancer center, the high rates of chemotherapy completion achieved on a multi-institutional trial can be difficult to reproduce in standard practice. Although C/F toxicity was greater in the standard care patients, their outcomes were similar to those of patients treated with C/F on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01.
AB - Purpose: To compare the treatment and outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) in a multi-institutional trial or as standard care. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the records of 302 patients treated with CT-RT for locoregionally confined, intact cervical cancer between 1990 and 2005. Of the 302 patients, 76 were treated using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (C/F) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01 (CT-RT90-01); 226 underwent CT-RT as standard care with either C/F [CT-RTSC(C/F); n = 115] or weekly cisplatin [CT-RTSC(WC); n = 111). Results: The CT-RT90-01 patients more often had tumors ≥6 cm and were less often diabetic than were the CT-RTSC patients. The CT-RTSC(WC) patients were more likely than the CT-RTSC(C/F) patients to be ≥60 years old or to have Stage III-IV disease. During treatment, CT-RTSC(C/F) patients experienced more Grade 2-3 neutropenia and were, therefore, less likely to receive 200 mg/m2 cisplatin than were either CT-RTSC(WC) or CT-RT90-01 patients (52% vs. 77% vs. 85%, respectively; p <0.001). At 5 years, the disease-specific survival rates were greater for patients treated with C/F [CT-RTSC(C/F), 75%; CT-RT90-01, 79%] than for those treated with CT-RTSC(WC) (58%; p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, C/F chemotherapy, cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2, Stage I-II disease, and negative pelvic lymph nodes were independent predictors of improved disease-specific survival. Conclusions: Even within a large comprehensive cancer center, the high rates of chemotherapy completion achieved on a multi-institutional trial can be difficult to reproduce in standard practice. Although C/F toxicity was greater in the standard care patients, their outcomes were similar to those of patients treated with C/F on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 90-01.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Compliance
KW - Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
KW - Outcome
KW - Treatment tolerance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37049003970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37049003970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 17869451
AN - SCOPUS:37049003970
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 70
SP - 118
EP - 125
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 1
ER -