Comprehensive analysis of clinicopathologic features and p53 mutation in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: experience from a large academic center

Saba Shafi, Yan Hu, Anil V. Parwani, Qingqing Ding, Zaibo Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The recent WHO classification of breast cancer (2019) categorizes breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation into three morphologically distinct subtypes: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and invasive breast carcinoma, no special type with neuroendocrine differentiation (IBC-NST-NE). Data regarding the prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation are conflicting and an association, if any, between p53 mutation and neuroendocrine differentiation is largely unknown. Methods: We examined p53 expression and other clinicopathologic characteristics in three types of invasive breast carcinoma with NE differentiation in a cohort of sixty-three patients, including 45 IBC-NST with NE differentiation, 10 NETs, and 8 NECs. Results: No significant difference of clinicopathologic feature was observed between IBC-NST with NE differentiation and NET, but NECs showed significantly lower expressions of hormone receptors, more mutated p53, and higher frequency of distant metastases than IBC-NST with NE differentiation and NETs. Conclusion: NECs of the breast are genetically and clinically different from IBC-NST-NEs and NETs of the breast.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-469
Number of pages7
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume196
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Neuroendocrine carcinoma
  • Neuroendocrine neoplasm
  • Neuroendocrine tumor
  • p53

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive analysis of clinicopathologic features and p53 mutation in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: experience from a large academic center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this