Cytomegalovirus disease in adult marrow transplant recipients receiving ganciclovir prophylaxis: A retrospective study

H. Maltazou, E. Whimbey, D. Abi-Said, D. Przepiorka, R. Champlain, J. M. Goodrich

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In a retrospective study, we compared the incidence and risk of mortality associated with CMV disease in adult allogeneic BMT and PBSC recipients who received ganciclovir prophylaxis three-times-per-week (78 patients) vs five-times-per-week (137 patients). Active CMV infection occurred in 28 (41%) and 26 (21%) in the three vs five-times-per-week groups, respectively (P < 0.005). CMV disease developed in 11 (16%) and five (4%) patients who received ganciclovir prophylaxis in the three-times-per-week vs five-times-per-week groups (P < 0.004). The CMV-attributable mortality rate was 1.5% and 12% in the five-vs three-times-per-week groups, respectively (P < 0.003). Risk factors for CMV disease, significant at the P < 0.05 level in the multivariate analysis, were ganciclovir prophylaxis at three-times-per-week, receiving a T cell-depleted (TCD) marrow, and tacrolimus as prophylaxis for GVHD. These data suggest that ganciclovir five-times-per-week significantly reduced the incidence and mortality of CMV disease in allogeneic BMT and PBSC recipients. However, ganciclovir five-times-per-week was less effective for the prevention of CMV disease in patients receiving TCD marrow or tacrolimus.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)665-669
    Number of pages5
    JournalBone marrow transplantation
    Volume24
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1999

    Keywords

    • Allogeneic marrow transplant
    • Cytomegalovirus
    • FK506
    • Ganciclovir
    • T cell depletion
    • Tacrolimus

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Hematology
    • Transplantation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cytomegalovirus disease in adult marrow transplant recipients receiving ganciclovir prophylaxis: A retrospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this