TY - JOUR
T1 - Death education in American medical schools
T2 - Tolstoy's challenge to Kübler-Ross
AU - Holleman, Warren Lee
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1991/3
Y1 - 1991/3
N2 - No one has done more to shape contemporary physicians' and nurses' understandings of dying and death than Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. A comparison of her views to those of another era, as delineated by Leo Tolstoy, raises questions concerning Kübler-Ross' five-stage theory and points out inadequacies in current medical education and in the values that shape American culture. According to Kübler-Ross, the dying person angrily asks "Why me?" Tolstoy's Ivan Ilych is more concerned about the implications for cosmic justice than for self-perpetuation, and angrily asks "Why death?" One's sadness is born of depression (sadness over the nearness of one's death), the other's is born of despair (sadness over the apparent meaninglessness of life or of life as one has lived it). Kübler-Ross and Tolstoy also differ in their views of what can be done to "sweeten the pill," whether "acceptance" is the best way to face death, and whether death ought to be viewed as a barrier to self-fulfillment or a means of self-transcendence.
AB - No one has done more to shape contemporary physicians' and nurses' understandings of dying and death than Elisabeth Kübler-Ross. A comparison of her views to those of another era, as delineated by Leo Tolstoy, raises questions concerning Kübler-Ross' five-stage theory and points out inadequacies in current medical education and in the values that shape American culture. According to Kübler-Ross, the dying person angrily asks "Why me?" Tolstoy's Ivan Ilych is more concerned about the implications for cosmic justice than for self-perpetuation, and angrily asks "Why death?" One's sadness is born of depression (sadness over the nearness of one's death), the other's is born of despair (sadness over the apparent meaninglessness of life or of life as one has lived it). Kübler-Ross and Tolstoy also differ in their views of what can be done to "sweeten the pill," whether "acceptance" is the best way to face death, and whether death ought to be viewed as a barrier to self-fulfillment or a means of self-transcendence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007957808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007957808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF01143039
DO - 10.1007/BF01143039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0007957808
SN - 1041-3545
VL - 12
SP - 11
EP - 18
JO - The Journal of Medical Humanities
JF - The Journal of Medical Humanities
IS - 1
ER -