Abstract
We conducted a critical interpretive analysis of 47 studies from the Cochrane Review of the communications training literature to capture the empirical indicators used to judge provider communication competency and to describe how the indicators were characterized in the context of a cancer care system. Of the 47 studies reviewed, few showed any resemblance to recommendations from two international consensus conferences of experts in the communication research field. Some of the challenges in moving forward with cancer-related communication skills involve deciding what we want people to learn, providing learning across various experiences, identifying learning models, and finding alternate ways of motivating people to learn. Once core competencies are clearly articulated, we can determine the best approaches for developing cancer-specific training programs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 861-872 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Psycho-oncology |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2005 |
Keywords
- Cancer
- Communication
- Competency
- Interpretative
- Intervention
- Oncology
- Provider
- Skills training
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Oncology
- Psychiatry and Mental health