Development of a draft core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in osteoarthritis: An OMERACT working group on shared decision making

Karine Toupin-April, Jennifer Barton, Liana Fraenkel, Linda Li, Viviane Grandpierre, Francis Guillemin, Tamara Rader, Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Janet Jull, Jennifer Petkovic, Marieke Scholte-Voshaar, Vivian Welch, Anne Lyddiatt, Cathie Hofstetter, Maarten De Wit, Lyn March, Tanya Meade, Robin Christensen, Cécile Gaujoux-VialaMaria E. Suarez-Almazor, Annelies Boonen, Christoph Pohl, Richard Martin, Peter S. Tugwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. Despite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers. Methods. We followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting. Results. In all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested. Conclusion. We proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2442-2447
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume42
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Implementation
  • Omeract
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Outcome assessment
  • Outcomes
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a draft core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in osteoarthritis: An OMERACT working group on shared decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this