Development of the remote 100 ml water swallow test versus clinical assessment in patients with head and neck cancer: Do they agree?

Laura Jayne Watson, Sarah H. Woodman, Deborah Ganderton, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Shirley Pringle, Joanne M. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The 100 ml water swallow test (WST) is a validated swallow assessment used in head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to determine the level of agreement when completing the 100 ml WST via clinician-graded video-testing or patient self-testing compared to standard face-to-face assessment (FTF). Methods: Convenience sampling from four UK centers. Inclusion criteria: patients with HNC treated with any modality prior to, or within 5 years of treatment. Participants were recruited to complete the 100 ml WST by video-testing or self-testing and compared with FTF. Results: Sixty-three patients were recruited; 1 was unable to perform the task; 30 in video-testing; and 32 in self-testing. There was no difference in swallow capacity (p = 0.424) and volume (p = 0.363) for the video-testing or the self-testing swallow capacity (p = 0.777) and volume (p = 0.445). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that video-testing and self-testing are reliable methods of completing the 100 ml WST for this sample of patients with HNC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2769-2778
Number of pages10
JournalHead and Neck
Volume44
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • 100 ml water swallow test
  • deglutition
  • dysphagia
  • head and neck cancer
  • swallowing efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of the remote 100 ml water swallow test versus clinical assessment in patients with head and neck cancer: Do they agree?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this