Differential sensitivity of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes to phorbol myristate acetate upon anti-CD3 stimulation: Evidence for a distinct signaling pathway

S. Chouaib, Y. Mahe, S. Mechri, M. Andreeff, K. Welte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The effects of suboptimal concentrations of Phorbol Myristate Acetate (PMA) in combination with submitogenic concentrations of OKT3 antibody on CD4+ and CD8+ cell activation were investigated. Upon stimulation with OKT3 (25 pg/ml) and PMA (0.25-0.75 ng/ml), the majority of CD4+ cells entered the cell cycle whereas most of CD8 + cells remained in G0/G1 phase. Under the same conditions of OKT3 stimulations, both CD4+ and CD8+ cells failed to produce IL2 in the absence of PMA. In the presence of PMA (0,25 ng/ml), CD4+ produced measurable amounts of IL2 (0,5-2,3 U/ml) whereas IL2 production by CD8 + cells remained below the detection limit. Expression of TAC antigen (CD25) was found to parallel IL2 production and cell proliferation in both subsets whereas changes in [Ca2+] mobilization following OKT3 stimulation were similar in both subsets. Interestingly, the elevation of intracellular cyclic adenosine 3':5' monophosphate (cAMP) was not equally distributed between CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations. Furthermore, the kinetics of protein kinase (PKC) translocation was markedly prolonged in membranes of CD4+ cells compared with CD8+ cells suggesting a differential involvement that may operate under distinct regulatory signaling mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-32
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential sensitivity of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes to phorbol myristate acetate upon anti-CD3 stimulation: Evidence for a distinct signaling pathway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this