Direct analysis of quantal radiation response data

Howard D. Thames, Mary E. Rozell, Susan L. Tucker, Kian K. Ang, David R. Fisher, Elizabeth L. Travis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

A direct analysis is proposed for quantal (all-or-nothing) responses to fractionated radiation and endpoint-dilution assays of cell survival. As opposed to two-step methods such as the reciprocal-dose technique, in which ED50 values are first estimated for different fractionation schemes and then fit (as reciprocals) against dose per fraction, all raw data are included in a single maximum-likelihood treatment. The method accomodates variations such as short-interval fractionation regimens designed to determine tissue repair kinetics, tissue response to continuous exposures, and data obtained using endpoint-dilution assays of cell survival after fractionated doses. Monte-Carlo techniques were used to compare the direct and reciprocal-dose methods for analysis of small-scale and large-scale studies of response to fractionated doses. Both methods tended toward biased estimates in the analysis of the small-scale (3 fraction numbers) studies. The αbeta; ratios showed less scatter when estimated by the direct method. Most important, the 95 per cent confidence intervals determined by the direct method were more appropriate than those determined by reciprocal-dose analysis, for which 18 per cent (small-scale study) or 8 per cent (large-scale study) of the confidence intervals did not include the 'true' value of αbeta;.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1009
Number of pages11
JournalInternational journal of radiation biology
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Keywords

  • Endpoint-dilution assay
  • Fractionation
  • Low dose rate
  • Maximum likelihood
  • Repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct analysis of quantal radiation response data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this