Direct Nerve Implantation Vs. Nerve-Muscle Pedicle: A Comparative Study of Reinnervation in the Rabbit

Michael Broniatowski, Laszlo A. Ilyes, Kelly Sorensen, David I. Rosenthal, Yukihiko Nose, Anthony J. Maniglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

To determine the optimal method for reinnervation of the paralyzed head and neck musculature, we compared direct muscular nerve implants (DNI) with nerve-muscle pedicles (NMP) in rabbits. In 25 anesthetized animals, one ansa hypoglossi nerve was cut. Five animals sensed as controls and two groups of 10 each received cross-over DNIs or NMP from one sternothyroid to the contralateral sternohyoid muscle. The transplanted nerves of animals that survived long enough for neurotization to occur (8 DNIs, 5 NMPs) were stimulated with 3 to 10 mA. 0.05 msec pulse trains to obtain force curves from corresponding straps. Fiber diameters and areas were calculated on muscles harvested before the animals were killed. There was a nonsignificant trend toward stronger contraction in the NMP group, but NMP fibers were significantly larger than those in DNI and control groups (p < 0.001).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-133
Number of pages8
JournalOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1989
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct Nerve Implantation Vs. Nerve-Muscle Pedicle: A Comparative Study of Reinnervation in the Rabbit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this