Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications

Nastaran Neishaboori, Roopma Wadhwa, Graciela M. Nogueras-González, Elena Elimova, Hironori Shiozaki, Kazuki Sudo, Nikolaos Charalampakis, Adarsh Hiremath, Jeffrey H. Lee, Manoop S. Bhutani, Brian Weston, Mariela A. Blum, Jane E. Rogers, Jeana L. Garris, David C. Rice, Ritsuko Komaki, Stephen G. Swisher, Heath D. Skinner, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Jaffer A. Ajani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: We have limited knowledge of the geographic distribution of resistant esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in resected specimens, but its clinical importance can be enormous. Method: We selected patients with baseline stage III EAC who had had chemoradiation followed by surgery and had residual EAC (resistant cases only). Outcomes were correlated with various endpoints (percentage of resistant EAC and anatomic distribution). Results: A total of 100 clinical stage III patients were studied; 90% had an R0 resection, and 99% had either moderate or poorly differentiated EAC. Twelve percent had >50% residual cancer, 31% had 11-50% residual cancer, 53% had 1-10% residual cancer, and 3% had positive nodes only. Each compartment was frequently involved: mucosa/submucosa (66%), muscularis propria (76%), and serosa (62%); all compartments were involved in 35% of the cases. Lack of EAC (meaning response) was observed in the mucosa/submucosa (34%), muscularis propria (24%), serosa (38%), and nodes (42%). Although the endoscopic biopsies prior to surgery showed no EAC in 79% of the patients, in the surgical specimens, resistant EAC was frequently occurring in the mucosa/submucosa (66%). Conclusion: Contrary to our hypothesis that resistant EAC would be frequent in the nodes, our data show that its distribution is heterogeneous and unpredictable. Most importantly, the postchemoradiation biopsies are misleading, and a decision to delay/avoid surgery based on negative biopsies can be detrimental for the patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-69
Number of pages5
JournalOncology (Switzerland)
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 22 2015

Keywords

  • Chemoradiation
  • Esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Surgery
  • Treatment decisions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group
  • Clinical Trials Office

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Distribution of Resistant Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Resected Specimens of Clinical Stage III Patients after Chemoradiation: Its Clinical Implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this