Do Lymph Node Metastases Matter in Appendiceal Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis? A US HIPEC Collaborative Study

Kevin M. Turner, Mackenzie C. Morris, Aaron M. Delman, Dennis Hanseman, Fabian M. Johnston, Jonathan Greer, Kara Vande Walle, Daniel E. Abbott, Mustafa Raoof, Travis E. Grotz, Keith Fournier, Sean Dineen, Jula Veerapong, Ugwuji Maduekwe, Anai Kothari, Charles A. Staley, Shishir K. Maithel, Laura A. Lambert, Alex C. Kim, Jordan M. CloydGregory C. Wilson, Jeffrey J. Sussman, Syed A. Ahmad, Sameer H. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Whether formal regional lymph node (LN) evaluation is necessary for patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) who have peritoneal metastases is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of LN metastases on survival in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Methods: A retrospective analysis of the US HIPEC collaborative, a multi-institutional consortium comprising 12 high-volume centers, was performed to identify patients with AA who underwent CRS-HIPEC with adequate LN sampling (≥ 12 LNs). Results: Two hundred-fifty patients with AA who underwent CRS-HIPEC were included. Outcomes were compared between LN − and LN + disease. Baseline patient characteristics between groups were similar, with most patients undergoing complete cytoreduction (0/1: 86.0% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.08), respectively. More adverse tumor factors were found in patients with LN + disease, including poor differentiation, signet ring cells, and lymphovascular invasion. Multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) found LN + disease was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 2.82 95%CI: 1.25–6.34, p = 0.01), even after correction for receipt of systemic therapy. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, median OS was lower in patients with LN + disease (25.9 months vs. 91.4 months, p < 0.01). LN + disease remained associated with poor OS following propensity score matching (HR: 4.98 95%CI: 1.72–14.40, p < 0.01) and in patients with PCI ≥ 20 (HR: 3.68 95%CI: 1.54–8.80, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this large multi-institutional study of patients with AA undergoing CRS-HIPEC, LN status remained associated with worse OS even in the setting of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Formal LN evaluation should be performed for most patients with AA undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2569-2578
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Appendiceal adenocarcinoma
  • Cytoreductive surgery
  • HIPEC
  • Lymph node metastases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Lymph Node Metastases Matter in Appendiceal Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis? A US HIPEC Collaborative Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this