Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: Model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect

J. D. Hamilton, J. Lin, C. Ison, N. E. Leeds, E. F. Jackson, G. N. Fuller, L. Ketonen, A. J. Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging has proved useful in determining whether a contrast-enhancing lesion is secondary to recurrent glial tumor or is treatment-related. In this article, we explore the best method for dynamic contrast-enhanced data analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients who met the following conditions: 1) had at least an initial treatment of a glioma, 2) underwent a half-dose contrast agent (0.05-mmol/kg) diagnostic-quality dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion study for an enhancing lesion, and 3) had a diagnosis by pathology within 30 days of imaging. The dynamic contrast-enhanced data were processed by using model-dependent analysis (nordicICE) using a 2-compartment model and model-independent signal intensity with time. Multiple methods of determining the vascular input function and numerous perfusion parameters were tested in comparison with a pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: The best accuracy (88%) with good correlation compared with pathology (P =.005) was obtained by using a novel, model-independent signal-intensity measurement derived from a brief integration beginning after the initial washout and by using the vascular input function from the superior sagittal sinus for normalization. Modeled parameters, such as mean endothelial transfer constant > 0.05 minutes-1, correlated (P =.002) but did not reach a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to the model-independent parameter. CONCLUSIONS: A novel model-independent dynamic contrast-enhanced analysis method showed diagnostic equivalency to more complex model-dependent methods. Having a brief integration after the first pass of contrast may diminish the effects of partial volume macroscopic vessels and slow progressive enhancement characteristic of necrosis. The simple modeling is technique- and observer-dependent but is less time-consuming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)686-693
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion processing for neuroradiologists: Model-dependent analysis may not be necessary for determining recurrent high-grade glioma versus treatment effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this