TY - JOUR
T1 - Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer
T2 - A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis
AU - Zhang, Yajie
AU - Chen, Chun
AU - Hu, Jian
AU - Han, Yu
AU - Huang, Maosheng
AU - Xiang, Jie
AU - Li, Hecheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Objectives: Anatomical segmentectomy via robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are minimally invasive surgical approaches for treatment of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few research studies have compared early outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 774 patients, 298 who received robotic and 476 who received VATS, who underwent minimally invasive segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC at 3 academic institutions between June 2015 and August 2019. Perioperative outcomes were compared after propensity score-matching on the basis of age, gender, body mass index, percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of segmentectomy, tumor size, and institution. Results: There were 257 patients in each group after propensity score-matching. The baseline characteristics and type of segmentectomy were comparable. Three conversions to thoracotomy occurred in the VATS group, and 1 in the robotic group (P = .624). There was no significant difference in operative time (147.91 ± 52.42 vs 149.23 ± 49.66 minutes; P = .773), blood loss (50 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] vs 100 mL [IQR, 30-100 mL]; P = .177), rates of overall complications (17.9 vs 14.8%; P = .340), and length of stay (4 days [IQR, 3-5 days] vs 4 days [IQR, 3-5 days]; P = .417) between the robotic and VATS groups, respectively. Robotic segmentectomy was more costly ($12,019.30 ± 1678.30 vs $7834.80 ± 1291.20; P < .001) because of the amortization and consumables of the robotic system. There were a greater number of N1 lymph nodes and N1 stations in the robotic group. Conclusions: Segmentectomy with robotic and VATS are safe and feasible for early-stage NSCLC treatment. A robotic approach might lead to a better N1 lymph node dissection.
AB - Objectives: Anatomical segmentectomy via robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are minimally invasive surgical approaches for treatment of early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few research studies have compared early outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 774 patients, 298 who received robotic and 476 who received VATS, who underwent minimally invasive segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC at 3 academic institutions between June 2015 and August 2019. Perioperative outcomes were compared after propensity score-matching on the basis of age, gender, body mass index, percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of segmentectomy, tumor size, and institution. Results: There were 257 patients in each group after propensity score-matching. The baseline characteristics and type of segmentectomy were comparable. Three conversions to thoracotomy occurred in the VATS group, and 1 in the robotic group (P = .624). There was no significant difference in operative time (147.91 ± 52.42 vs 149.23 ± 49.66 minutes; P = .773), blood loss (50 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] vs 100 mL [IQR, 30-100 mL]; P = .177), rates of overall complications (17.9 vs 14.8%; P = .340), and length of stay (4 days [IQR, 3-5 days] vs 4 days [IQR, 3-5 days]; P = .417) between the robotic and VATS groups, respectively. Robotic segmentectomy was more costly ($12,019.30 ± 1678.30 vs $7834.80 ± 1291.20; P < .001) because of the amortization and consumables of the robotic system. There were a greater number of N1 lymph nodes and N1 stations in the robotic group. Conclusions: Segmentectomy with robotic and VATS are safe and feasible for early-stage NSCLC treatment. A robotic approach might lead to a better N1 lymph node dissection.
KW - propensity score matching
KW - robotic
KW - segmentectomy
KW - video-assisted thoracic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079832950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079832950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.112
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.112
M3 - Article
C2 - 32113718
AN - SCOPUS:85079832950
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 160
SP - 1363
EP - 1372
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 5
ER -