Effect on perfusion values of sampling interval of computed tomographic perfusion acquisitions in neuroendocrine liver metastases and normal liver

Chaan S. Ng, Brian P. Hobbs, Wei Wei, Ella F. Anderson, Delise H. Herron, James C. Yao, Adam G. Chandler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the effects of sampling interval (SI) of computed tomographic (CT) perfusion acquisitions on CT perfusion values in normal liver and liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Methods Computed tomographic perfusion in 16 patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases was analyzed using distributed-parameter modeling to yield tissue blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, permeability, and hepatic arterial fraction for tumor and normal liver. Computed tomographic perfusion values for the reference SI of 0.5 s (SI 0.5) were compared with those of SI data sets of 1 second, 2 seconds, 3 seconds, and 4 seconds using mixed-effects model analyses. Results Increases in SI beyond 1 second were associated with significant and increasing departures of CT perfusion parameters from the reference values at SI 0.5 (P ≤ 0.0009). Computed tomographic perfusion values deviated from the reference with increasing uncertainty with increasing SIs. Findings for normal liver were concordant. Conclusions Increasing SIs beyond 1 second yield significantly different CT perfusion parameter values compared with the reference values at SI 0.5.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-382
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of computer assisted tomography
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 29 2015

Keywords

  • CT acquisition parameters
  • CT perfusion
  • liver tumors
  • normal liver
  • sampling frequency
  • sampling interval

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group
  • Clinical Trials Office

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect on perfusion values of sampling interval of computed tomographic perfusion acquisitions in neuroendocrine liver metastases and normal liver'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this