Effectiveness of an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer

Takeo Fujii, Fanny Le Du, Lianchun Xiao, Takahiro Kogawa, Carlos H. Barcenas, Ricardo H. Alvarez, Vicente Valero, Yu Shen, Naoto T. Ueno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE To find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens. RESULTS We identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95%CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95%CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1311-1318
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume1
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this