TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of maximum performance instructions on the sentence completion test of ego development
AU - Blumentritt, Tracie
AU - Novy, Diane M.
AU - Gaa, John P.
AU - Liberman, Dov
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1996/8
Y1 - 1996/8
N2 - This modified replication of Jurich and Holt's (1987) test-retest study investigated the stability of scores on the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (SCT; Loevinger, 1985; Loevinger and Wessler, 1970; Loevinger, Wessler and Redmore, 1970) across alternate instructional formats. Initially, 90 adult participants completed the SCT using standardized instructions. After a 1-week interval participants were readministered the SCT based on random assignment to either a standardized instruction (control) group, a role-play instructional set, or a best-effort instructional set. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance yielded statistically significant differences in ego level scores across the 3 instructional sets. The differences in ego level scores were approximately one-half level higher for the role-play and best-effort instructional sets. Effect sizes for the experimental instructional sets ranged from .23 using item sum scores to .45 using total protocol ratings. Results are supportive of Jurich and Holt's (1987) findings, indicating that the standardized instruction SCT may be susceptible to the motivational set of the test-taker.
AB - This modified replication of Jurich and Holt's (1987) test-retest study investigated the stability of scores on the Washington University Sentence Completion Test (SCT; Loevinger, 1985; Loevinger and Wessler, 1970; Loevinger, Wessler and Redmore, 1970) across alternate instructional formats. Initially, 90 adult participants completed the SCT using standardized instructions. After a 1-week interval participants were readministered the SCT based on random assignment to either a standardized instruction (control) group, a role-play instructional set, or a best-effort instructional set. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance yielded statistically significant differences in ego level scores across the 3 instructional sets. The differences in ego level scores were approximately one-half level higher for the role-play and best-effort instructional sets. Effect sizes for the experimental instructional sets ranged from .23 using item sum scores to .45 using total protocol ratings. Results are supportive of Jurich and Holt's (1987) findings, indicating that the standardized instruction SCT may be susceptible to the motivational set of the test-taker.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029937164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029937164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15327752jpa6701_6
DO - 10.1207/s15327752jpa6701_6
M3 - Article
C2 - 8683427
AN - SCOPUS:0029937164
SN - 0022-3891
VL - 67
SP - 79
EP - 89
JO - Journal of Personality Assessment
JF - Journal of Personality Assessment
IS - 1
ER -