Efficacy of Ponatinib Versus Earlier Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Front-line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Elias Jabbour, Maral DerSarkissian, Mei Sheng Duh, Nora McCormick, Wendy Y. Cheng, Lisa J. McGarry, Ariadne Souroutzidis, Hui Huang, Susan O'Brien, Farhad Ravandi, Hagop M. Kantarjian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The complete molecular response (CMR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with front-line chemotherapy plus ponatinib versus earlier generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were compared in a meta-analysis and meta-regression. The patients treated with front-line ponatinib versus earlier generation treatments were more likely to achieve a CMR and had greater rates of 3-year OS. Introduction: Complete molecular response (CMR) and 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) were compared for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) who had undergone front-line combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib versus combination therapy plus earlier generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib). Patients and Methods: We identified 26 Ph+ ALL studies: 25 of earlier generation TKIs and 1 of ponatinib. The outcomes from studies of combination chemotherapy plus earlier generation TKIs were summarized using pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from a random-effects meta-analysis. A binomial distribution was assumed to calculate the 95% CIs for the results from the single-arm combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib trial. Adjusted logistic meta-regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the TKI groups. Results: The percentage of patients achieving a CMR was greater with combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib (79%) than the pooled percentage of patients achieving a CMR with combination chemotherapy plus earlier generation TKIs (34%). Greater OS was observed with ponatinib compared with the pooled OS for earlier generation TKIs (2-year, 83% vs. 58%; 3-year, 79% vs. 50%). Odds ratios for ponatinib versus earlier generation TKIs were 6.09 (95% CI, 1.16-31.90; P =.034) for CMR, 3.70 (95% CI, 0.93-14.73; P =.062) for 2-year OS, and 4.49 (95% CI, 1.00-20.13; P =.050) for 3-year OS. Conclusion: Ponatinib plus chemotherapy might be associated with better outcomes than chemotherapy with earlier generation TKIs in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-265
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Combination therapy
  • Complete molecular response
  • Meta-analysis
  • Meta-regression
  • Overall survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of Ponatinib Versus Earlier Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Front-line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this