Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The prognostic utility of Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in ampullary adenocarcinoma is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association between initial tumor marker levels and survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1999 to 2021. CA 19-9 was assessed after biliary decompression. Contal and O'Quigley method determined optimal biomarker cutoff levels which were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. Results: A total of 180 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with CA 19-9 >100 U/mL had a shorter median OS (28 vs. 132 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with CA 19-9 ≤ 100 U/mL at diagnosis. Survival was similar between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal tumor subtypes when CA 19-9 was >100 U/mL (OS:25 vs. 33 months, p = 0.415). By Cox regression analysis, CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.8, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative CA 19-9 >100 U/mL was associated with shorter OS in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. CA 19–9 may be useful when counseling patients about prognosis or when considering the role of perioperative systemic therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101994
JournalSurgical Oncology
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Ampulla of vater
  • Carbohydrate antigen 19-9
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen
  • Carcinoma
  • Pancreatoduodenectomy
  • peri-ampullary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Elevated CA 19-9 is associated with worse survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this