Employment outcomes among survivors of common cancers: The Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study

A. J. Tevaarwerk, J. W. Lee, M. E. Sesto, K. A. Buhr, C. S. Cleeland, J. Manola, L. I. Wagner, V. T.S. Chang, M. J. Fisch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Risk factors for employment difficulties after cancer diagnosis are incompletely understood, and interventions to improve post-cancer employment remain few. New targets for intervention are needed. Methods: We assessed a cohort of 530 nonmetastatic cancer patients (aged ≤ 65 years, >6 months from diagnosis, off chemo- or radiotherapy) from the observational multi-site Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Participants reported employment change, current employment, and symptoms. Groups were based on employment at survey (working full- or part-time versus not working) and whether there had been a change due to illness (yes versus no). The predictive power of symptom interference with work was evaluated for employment group (working stably versus no longer working). Race/ethnicity, gender, cancer type, therapy, and time since diagnosis were also assessed. Association between employment group and specific symptoms was examined. Results: The cohort was largely non-Hispanic white (76 %), female (85 %), and diagnosed with breast cancer (75 %); 24 % reported a change in employment. On multivariable analysis, participants with at least moderate symptom interference were more likely to report no longer working than their less effected counterparts (odds ratio (OR) = 8. 0, 95 % CI, 4. 2-15. 4), as were minority participants compared with their non-Hispanic white counterparts (OR = 3. 2, 95 % CI, 1. 8-5. 6). Results from the multiple regression model indicated the combination of fatigue (OR = 2. 3, 95 % CI, 1. 1-4. 7), distress (OR = 3. 9, 95 % CI, 1. 7-9. 0), and dry mouth (OR = 2. 6, 95 % CI, 1. 1-6. 2) together with race/ethnicity and time since diagnosis adequately accounted for employment group. Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that residual symptom burden is related to post-cancer employment: Residual symptoms may be targets for intervention to improve work outcomes among cancer survivors. Implications for Cancer Survivors: This analysis examines whether increased symptom burden is associated with a change to not working following a cancer diagnosis. We also examined individual symptoms to assess which symptoms were most strongly associated with not working after a cancer diagnosis. Our hope is that we will be able to use this information to both screen survivors post-active treatment as well as target high-risk symptoms for further and more aggressive intervention, in an attempt to improve post-cancer work outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-202
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Keywords

  • Cancer survivor
  • Post-cancer employment
  • Return to work
  • Survivor symptom burden
  • Work disability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Employment outcomes among survivors of common cancers: The Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this