Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its modulation during an α-difluoromethylornithine chemoprevention trial

Chemoprevention trials designed to prevent progression to invasive cervical cancer will benefit from the identification of biomarkers that assess the risk of developing tumors, predict likelihood of response to treatment, and measure biological response to intervention. The purpose of this study was to examine expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a marker for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and as a surrogate end point biomarker in a chemoprevention trial with α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), an inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase. To evaluate quantitative and spatial changes in EGFR expression during cervical tumorigenesis, paraffin sections from 42 archival cervical cone biopsies, each containing multiple stages of CIN, were immunohistochemically stained for EGFR, and the level and spatial expression of EGFR were quantitated by image analysis. In the progression from normal epithelium to CIN 1 to CIN 2 to CIN 3 to invasive cancer, EGFR expression showed two types of changes. Normal control epithelium showed EGFR expression predominantly confined to the basal layer, while histologically normal epithelium in specimens containing CIN showed relatively increased EGFR expression in the basal layer and the extension of EGFR expression away from the basal layer. The total EGFR relative staining intensity (RSI) of epithelium increased with the degree of CIN, predominantly due to a progressive expansion of EGFR- expressing cells away from the basal layer rather than an increase in the level of EGFR expression per cell. To determine whether EGFR expression would be modulated by a 1-month chemopreventive intervention with DFMO, pretreatment and posttreatment cervical biopsy specimens from 25 patients (22 evaluable) were examined for EGFR expression. Although the overall levels of EGFR expression were not modulated in either histological responders or nonresponders, responders showed a prominent down-regulation of EGFR expression away from the basal layer after DFMO treatment. Interestingly, pretreatment EGFR expression levels predicted for DFMO response [i.e., eight responses (72.7%) for 11 cases with RSI levels below 0.35 versus one response (9.1%) for 11 cases with RSI levels above 0.35 (P < 0.01)]. These results suggest that CIN progression is associated with a spatial dysregulation of EGFR expression that can be reversed by DFMO treatment, especially in patients whose pretreatment CIN 3 lesions exhibit relatively low EGFR expression.