TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of high dose volumetric CT to reduce inter-observer delineation variability and PTV margins for prostate cancer radiotherapy
AU - Alasti, Hamideh
AU - Cho, Young Bin
AU - Catton, Charles
AU - Berlin, Alejandro
AU - Chung, Peter
AU - Bayley, Andrew
AU - Vandermeer, Aaron
AU - Kong, Vickie
AU - Jaffray, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Purpose: The aim was to determine whether the enhanced soft tissue contrast provided by high-dose volumetric CT (HDVCT) can reduce inter-observer variability in delineating prostate compared to helical conventional CT (CCT) scans and 3T MRI scans for patients undergoing radical prostate cancer radiotherapy. Secondly, to quantify the potential PTV reduction with decreased inter-observer variability. Materials and methods: A 320 slice volumetric CT scanner was used. The wide-detector coverage of 16 cm enabled volumetric image acquisition of prostate gland in one rotation. Three imaging studies were performed on ten patients. CCT and HDVCT were performed consecutively at the same coordinate system followed by MRI. Five radiation oncologists delineated the prostate. Results: The inter-observer variability is 2.0 ± 0.6, 1.9 ± 0.4 and 1.8 ± 0.4 mm for CCT, HDVCT and MR respectively with the maximum at the apex region. Comparing inter-observer difference variability between CCT and HDVCT with MR indicates that observers have larger variations in contouring using CCT than HDVCT especially at apex. Jaccard index of HDVCT is significantly higher than CCT with a mean difference of 0.03 (p = 0.011). Both MRI and HDVCT provide the opportunity for a 2 mm PTV margin reduction at the apex compared to CCT. Conclusion: Inter-observer variability in delineation remains an important source of systematic error. HDCTV for treatment planning reduces this error without recourse to MRI and permits a PTV reduction of 2 mm at the apex. The margins required to account for residual error with any imaging modality are still greater than are used in typical current practice.
AB - Purpose: The aim was to determine whether the enhanced soft tissue contrast provided by high-dose volumetric CT (HDVCT) can reduce inter-observer variability in delineating prostate compared to helical conventional CT (CCT) scans and 3T MRI scans for patients undergoing radical prostate cancer radiotherapy. Secondly, to quantify the potential PTV reduction with decreased inter-observer variability. Materials and methods: A 320 slice volumetric CT scanner was used. The wide-detector coverage of 16 cm enabled volumetric image acquisition of prostate gland in one rotation. Three imaging studies were performed on ten patients. CCT and HDVCT were performed consecutively at the same coordinate system followed by MRI. Five radiation oncologists delineated the prostate. Results: The inter-observer variability is 2.0 ± 0.6, 1.9 ± 0.4 and 1.8 ± 0.4 mm for CCT, HDVCT and MR respectively with the maximum at the apex region. Comparing inter-observer difference variability between CCT and HDVCT with MR indicates that observers have larger variations in contouring using CCT than HDVCT especially at apex. Jaccard index of HDVCT is significantly higher than CCT with a mean difference of 0.03 (p = 0.011). Both MRI and HDVCT provide the opportunity for a 2 mm PTV margin reduction at the apex compared to CCT. Conclusion: Inter-observer variability in delineation remains an important source of systematic error. HDCTV for treatment planning reduces this error without recourse to MRI and permits a PTV reduction of 2 mm at the apex. The margins required to account for residual error with any imaging modality are still greater than are used in typical current practice.
KW - CT and MR comparison
KW - CT image quality enhancement
KW - Inter-observer variability
KW - Planning target margin
KW - Prostate radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028387418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028387418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.012
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 28859933
AN - SCOPUS:85028387418
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 125
SP - 118
EP - 123
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -