TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Midodrine Utilization in Patients with Cancer and Heart Failure
AU - Irizarry-Caro, Jorge A.
AU - Song, Juhee
AU - Miller, Chase
AU - Desai, Shyam
AU - Going, James
AU - Fossas-Espinosa, Jose
AU - Fatakdawala, Mariya M.
AU - Ali, Abdelrahman
AU - Iliescu, Cezar
AU - Palaskas, Nicolas
AU - Deswal, Anita
AU - Koutroumpakis, Efstratios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and cardiovascular outcomes as well as overall survival of cancer patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) treated with midodrine for hypotension. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and HF who were treated with midodrine at a tertiary cancer center from 03/2013 to 08/2021 were identified. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected retrospectively. Results: A total of 85 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (IQR: 60, 74; 33% female and 85% White). Of those, 31% had HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), 42% HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; EF 41–49%), and 27% HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). The most common indication for midodrine use was orthostatic hypotension (49%). Midodrine was continued for at least one month in 57% of the patients. Supine hypertension was the only side effect reported in 6% of patients. No statistically significant changes in NYHA class, guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or troponin T), echocardiographic findings or cardiovascular hospitalizations were observed between patients who continued treatment with midodrine compared to those who stopped using midodrine over a median follow-up of 38 months. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, continuation of midodrine, compared to discontinuation, and use of midodrine for orthostatic hypotension, as opposed to other causes of hypotension, were not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.69, p <.0001; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.64, p <.001, respectively). In contrast, elevated creatinine (> 1.3 for males and > 1.1 for females) was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07–3.14). LVEF was not significantly associated with lower or higher risk of mortality. Conclusions: In our study, midodrine use in patients with cancer and HF was not associated with significant adverse effects, worse cardiovascular outcomes, or increased risk of mortality. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and cardiovascular outcomes as well as overall survival of cancer patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) treated with midodrine for hypotension. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and HF who were treated with midodrine at a tertiary cancer center from 03/2013 to 08/2021 were identified. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected retrospectively. Results: A total of 85 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (IQR: 60, 74; 33% female and 85% White). Of those, 31% had HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), 42% HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; EF 41–49%), and 27% HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). The most common indication for midodrine use was orthostatic hypotension (49%). Midodrine was continued for at least one month in 57% of the patients. Supine hypertension was the only side effect reported in 6% of patients. No statistically significant changes in NYHA class, guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or troponin T), echocardiographic findings or cardiovascular hospitalizations were observed between patients who continued treatment with midodrine compared to those who stopped using midodrine over a median follow-up of 38 months. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, continuation of midodrine, compared to discontinuation, and use of midodrine for orthostatic hypotension, as opposed to other causes of hypotension, were not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.69, p <.0001; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.64, p <.001, respectively). In contrast, elevated creatinine (> 1.3 for males and > 1.1 for females) was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07–3.14). LVEF was not significantly associated with lower or higher risk of mortality. Conclusions: In our study, midodrine use in patients with cancer and HF was not associated with significant adverse effects, worse cardiovascular outcomes, or increased risk of mortality. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
KW - Cancer
KW - Guideline-directed medical therapy
KW - Heart failure
KW - Hypotension
KW - Midodrine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182460701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182460701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10557-024-07546-4
DO - 10.1007/s10557-024-07546-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 38224416
AN - SCOPUS:85182460701
SN - 0920-3206
JO - Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
JF - Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
ER -