Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges

Kristin G. Maki, Sanjay Shete, Robert J. Volk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for high-risk smokers who meet specific eligibility criteria. Current guidelines suggest that eligible adults with a heavy smoking history will benefit from annual low dose computed tomography but due to several associated risks (e.g., false-positives, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis) a shared decision-making consultation is required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and endorsed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. In order to examine potential for tracking LCS uptake, adherence, and patient-provider communication at a national level, we reviewed four regularly publicly available national surveys (National Health Interview Survey [NHIS], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System [BRFSS], National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES], and Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]) to assess available data; an overview of 37 publications using these sources is also provided. The results show that none of the surveys include items that fully assess current LCS guidelines. Implications for future research—including the potential to examine factors associated with LCS uptake and patient-provider communication—are addressed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106503
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume147
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Lung cancer screening
  • National datasets
  • Patient-provider communication
  • Review article
  • Secondary analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group
  • Shared Decision Making Core

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining lung cancer screening utilization with public-use data: Opportunities and challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this