TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the Acceptability of Behavioral Swallowing Interventions for Head and Neck Cancer Patients During Radiotherapy
T2 - A Qualitative Study of Patients’ Experience
AU - Manduchi, Beatrice
AU - Fitch, Margaret I.
AU - Ringash, Jolie G.
AU - Howell, Doris
AU - Hutcheson, Katherine A.
AU - Martino, Rosemary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - The PRO-ACTIVE randomized clinical trial offers 3 swallowing therapies to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients during radiotherapy namely: reactive, proactive low- (“EAT-RT” only), and high-intensity (“EAT-RT + exercises”). Understanding the perceived acceptability of these interventions is important to inform eventual implementation into clinical practice. This study explored patients’ perspectives using qualitative methodology. At 2 Canadian PRO-ACTIVE trial sites, 24 trial participants were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews, representing each of the 3 trial arms. Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Member checking was conducted through follow-up focus groups. Seven themes were derived reflecting the TFA constructs. Overall, regardless of trial arm, patients reported a positive experience with therapy. Patients identified benefits of EAT-RT therapy, reporting that it provided meaningful feedback on diet progress and supported goal setting for oral intake. Patients who received proactive therapies valued the opportunity to set expectations early, build mealtime routine iteratively over time, and have an extended engagement with the SLP. Regardless of trial arm, patients agreed proactive therapy aligned with what they think is best and that therapy intensity should accommodate individual needs. This study identified the value to HNC patients of receiving swallowing interventions during RT and setting realistic expectations around swallowing. Compared to reactive care, proactive therapies were perceived helpful in consolidating habits early, establishing realistic expectations around swallowing and building an extended rapport with the SLP. These findings will inform the implementation of proactive versus reactive swallowing therapies in clinical practice.
AB - The PRO-ACTIVE randomized clinical trial offers 3 swallowing therapies to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients during radiotherapy namely: reactive, proactive low- (“EAT-RT” only), and high-intensity (“EAT-RT + exercises”). Understanding the perceived acceptability of these interventions is important to inform eventual implementation into clinical practice. This study explored patients’ perspectives using qualitative methodology. At 2 Canadian PRO-ACTIVE trial sites, 24 trial participants were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews, representing each of the 3 trial arms. Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Member checking was conducted through follow-up focus groups. Seven themes were derived reflecting the TFA constructs. Overall, regardless of trial arm, patients reported a positive experience with therapy. Patients identified benefits of EAT-RT therapy, reporting that it provided meaningful feedback on diet progress and supported goal setting for oral intake. Patients who received proactive therapies valued the opportunity to set expectations early, build mealtime routine iteratively over time, and have an extended engagement with the SLP. Regardless of trial arm, patients agreed proactive therapy aligned with what they think is best and that therapy intensity should accommodate individual needs. This study identified the value to HNC patients of receiving swallowing interventions during RT and setting realistic expectations around swallowing. Compared to reactive care, proactive therapies were perceived helpful in consolidating habits early, establishing realistic expectations around swallowing and building an extended rapport with the SLP. These findings will inform the implementation of proactive versus reactive swallowing therapies in clinical practice.
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Intervention acceptability
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Swallowing
KW - Theoretical framework of acceptability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177574482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177574482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00455-023-10640-8
DO - 10.1007/s00455-023-10640-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 37991659
AN - SCOPUS:85177574482
SN - 0179-051X
VL - 39
SP - 593
EP - 607
JO - Dysphagia
JF - Dysphagia
IS - 4
ER -