Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: Application to an article in cancer

Donald A. Berry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Observational studies present inferential challenges. These challenges are acute in cancer screening studies, in which lead-time and length biases are ever present. These biases can make any study worthless. Moreover, a flawed study's impact on the public can be deleterious when its conclusions are publicized by a naïve media. Flawed studies can also make the public learn to be wary of any article or reports of articles claiming to be scientific. Here, the author addresses these and related issues in the context of a study published in Cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2784-2791
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume120
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • Efficacy of screening mammography by age
  • Lead-time bias
  • Length bias
  • Observational studies
  • Randomized screening trials
  • Screening mammography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failure of researchers, reviewers, editors, and the media to understand flaws in cancer screening studies: Application to an article in cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this